- Mitglied seit
- Sep 28, 2012
- Beiträge
- 5.873
Quelle: http://forum.fractalaudio.com/axe-fx-ii-discussion/98592-axe-fx-ii-firmware-18-07-released.html#post1182736Fixes bug in Cab block where UltraRes IRs weren't processed correctly.
Mark I/II:
www.fractalaudio.com/downloads/firmware-presets/axe-fx-2/18.0/axefx2_18p07.zip
XL:
www.fractalaudio.com/downloads/firmware-presets/axe-fx-2/18.0/axefx2_xl_18p07.zip
XL+:
www.fractalaudio.com/downloads/firmware-presets/axe-fx-2/18.0/axefx2_xlplus_18p07.zip
Wieso und warum ist aus diesem extrem Ultra-Res kritischen thread zu entnehmen:
http://forum.fractalaudio.com/axe-fx-ii-discussion/98578-why-i-wont-using-cab-block-recording-any-more-5.html
Quelle: http://forum.fractalaudio.com/axe-fx-ii-discussion/98578-why-i-wont-using-cab-block-recording-any-more-4.html#post1182669Well this is embarrassing.
I refused to believe that there could be that much difference as I've extensively tested UltraRes in the past. So I just ran some tests and, sure enough, there was a difference. Turns out UltraRes has been broke since Version 16.03. We made some code optimizations and moved some stuff between stack and heap and missed a variable.
Sooooo... Version 18.07 will coming soon.
Quelle: http://forum.fractalaudio.com/axe-fx-ii-discussion/98578-why-i-wont-using-cab-block-recording-any-more-5.html#post1182690I'm a huge advocate of longer IRs. In fact I think I was the first to advocate it despite all the naysayers. I pushed OwnHammer (and others) to increase their IR lengths and they were the only ones who acted on that advice (so far, maybe the other guys will start to follow suit). UltraRes was born out of the desire for longer IRs.
For recording you don't need to use the cab block in the Axe-Fx though. Record the raw amp sound and then "re-cab" it later. This way you can try different cabs. Cab-Lab is great for this. Cab-Lab does not do UltraRes processing. It creates UltraRes files for the Axe-Fx but it does all processing at the full IR length up to 8K samples. You can use other convolution plug-ins as well.
The reason for UltraRes is that long IRs have several drawbacks:
1. They require lots of storage space. Not an issue on a computer but on a hardware product that means expensive non-volatile memory.
2. They require lots of processing power if you don't want any latency. On a computer it doesn't matter since latency is a non-factor if you are processing prerecorded tracks. On a hardware product we must have zero latency.
So UltraRes was devised as a way to exploit the statistics of the data to give the benefits of longer IRs without the usual hardware drawbacks.
Ich weiss schon, wieso ich unbedingt auf .wav-Basis IR`s capturen wollte, ich habe es oft genug geschrieben - auch hier auf axefx.de ... Es lohnt diesen thread von Anfang an zu lesen! Gerade Kevin von Ownhammer zeigt interessantes auf!
Zuletzt bearbeitet: